Civic Administration Building
Phone: (06) 871 5000
Fax: (06) 871 5100
WWW.hastingsdc.govt.nz
A G E N D A
Commissioner Hearing
(Craggy Range Track Remediation Hearing)
Meeting Date: |
Tuesday, 11 June 2019 |
Time: |
9.00am |
Venue: |
Council Chamber Ground Floor Civic Administration Building Lyndon Road East Hastings |
Hearing Commissioners |
Chair: Commissioner Paul Cooney Commissioner Rau Kirikiri |
Officer Responsible |
Group Manager: Planning & Regulatory Services |
Reporting Planner |
Consultant Planner – Philip Brown |
Committee Secretary |
Christine Hilton (Extn 5633) |
HASTINGS DISTRICT COUNCIL
A Commissioner Hearing will be Held COMMENCING in the Council Chamber, Ground Floor, Civic Administration Building, Lyndon Road East, Hastings on
Tuesday, 11 June 2019 AT 9.00am
1. Apologies
At the close of the agenda no requests for leave of absence had been received.
2. Craggy Range Track Remediation Hearing
Documents circulated for Hearing - Compiled as Three Separate documents
Document 1 The covering administrative report Pg 1
Attachments:
Attachment 28 - Planning report 97017#0129 Pg 9
The Application and Submissions can be viewed on the Council website and a reference hardcopy is held at the Council Civic Administration Building.
File Ref: 19/415 |
|
REPORT TO: Commissioner Hearing
MEETING DATE: Tuesday 11 June 2019
FROM: COMMITTEE SECRETARY
Christine Hilton
SUBJECT: Craggy Range Track Remediation Hearing
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 This is a covering report relating to a hearing commencing on Tuesday, 11 June 2019 which addresses a resource consent application for remediation to the Craggy Range Track.
1.2 This agenda can be viewed on the Council website and a reference hardcopy of the Application, Planning Report and associated information and Submissions can be viewed on the Council website and a reference hardcopy is held at the Council Civic Administration Building.
1.3 (Note: For ease of reference, the Recommendations from the attached Planner’s Report are also set out below)
That pursuant to Rule EM6 and EM12 of the Proposed Hastings District Plan (As Amended by Decisions 15 September 2015) and Sections 104, 104B and 108 of the Resource Management Act 1991, resource consent as a Discretionary Activity is GRANTED to Hastings District Council to undertake earthworks for the purpose of removing the remaining sections of the Te Mata Peak Track (Craggy Range Track), to reinstate the original contours of the land, and restore the vegetation cover to pasture on a site located at Waimarama Road, Havelock North and legally described as Lot 3 DP 316592 and Lot 3 DP 408476.
1.0 RECOMMENDATION A. That pursuant to rule EM6 and EM12 of the Proposed Hastings District Plan (As Amended by Decisions 15 September 2015) and Sections 104, 104B and 108 of the Resource Management Act 1991, resource consent as a Discretionary Activity is GRANTED to Hastings District Council to undertake earthworks for the purpose of removing the remaining sections of the Te Mata Peak Track (Craggy Range Track), to reinstate the original contours of the land, and restore the vegetation cover to pasture on a site located at Waimarama Road, Havelock North and legally described as Lot 3 DP 316592 and Lot 3 DP 408476. SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS GENERAL
1. That unless otherwise altered by the consent conditions, the proposal shall proceed in accordance with the plans and information submitted in the application Resource Consent: RMA20190006, application received 14 January 2019, specifically:
a) Completed application form (dated 14 January 2019) b) Land use consent and assessment of environmental effects report, prepared by Sage Planning (dated 14 January 2019); c) The methodology set out in the technical specification prepared by Frame Group Limited and referenced as ‘Craggy Range Track – Te Mata Peak Partial Track Removal Works’, Specification No. FGL 18/033/01 (dated January 2019); and d) Landscape and Visual Effects Assessment, prepared by Boffa Miskell (dated 11 January 2019).
STOCK ACCESS 2. That stock shall be excluded from the remediated sections of the track (sections A, B and C) for an initial period of 12 months from the completion of the works. At the conclusion of this period, a review of the stability of the remediated surface and the extent of grass cover shall be undertaken by the consent holder and the Council shall be advised of the findings. A further period of stock exclusion may be required by the Environmental Consents Manager if required in order to minimise risk of erosion along the former track surface.
WEED MANAGEMENT
3. That weed removal be undertaken as required to keep the former track alignment free of weeds. Regular weed removal shall occur until such time as there is no significant regrowth and the grass cover is fully established across the earthworks area, to the satisfaction of the Environmental Consents Manager (or nominee).
ACCIDENTAL DISCOVERY PROTOCOL
4. Any person employed to undertake the earthworks and remediation work associated with this consent shall be conversant with the following protocol to ensure they are aware of their obligations under the Resource Management Act, and the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014: If, at any time during site works potential koiwi (human remains), archaeology or artefacts are discovered, the following discovery protocol is to be followed: a) All earthworks will cease in the immediate vicinity (at least 10m from the site of the discovery) while a suitably qualified archaeologist is consulted to establish the type of remains;
b) All practicable steps must be taken to secure the site and ensure that items uncovered/found remain undisturbed.
c) If the material is identified by the archaeologist as human, archaeology or an artefact, earthworks must remain on hold in the affected area (as defined by the archaeologist). The consent holder must immediately advise the Environmental Consents Manager, Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga, mana whenua, and Police (if human remains are found), and arrange a site inspection with these parties;
d) Consultation will be undertaken between the mana whenua, Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga and the Authority holder/project manager to determine the most appropriate course of action.
e) If the discovery contains koiwi, archaeology or artefacts of Maori origin, representatives from all potentially interested iwi groups are to be provided information on the nature and location of the discovery;
f) The consent holder shall not recommence works until all relevant authorities and consents have been obtained and recommencement has been approved by the Environmental Consents Manager (or nominee) in conjunction with Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga and mana whenua.
CONSTRUCTION NOISE
5. All construction work shall be conducted to ensure that noise measured at the notional boundary of any dwelling or noise sensitive activity does not exceed the Typical Duration Limits Specified in NZS6803:1999.
6. All construction noise shall be measured in accordance with New Zealand Standard 6803:1999 “Acoustics – Construction Noise.”
7. All construction work shall be limited to the hours of 7:00am – 5:00pm Monday to Friday and 8:00am – 5:00pm Saturday (with no work on Sundays or public holidays).
DUST AND DEBRIS
8. That the consent holder shall take all measures necessary to ensure the prevention of dust nuisance on adjacent land owners or occupiers, or the transportation of debris beyond the work area. Measures shall include, but are not limited to, the following:
a) During dry windy periods the stockpile and exposed earthworks area shall be covered or moistened as required to prevent dust nuisance.
b) Should offensive or objectionable dust be observed beyond the site boundary, the activities generating the dust must cease immediately and must not restart until such time as the dust nuisance has been remedied.
c) In the event of mud or other debris being carried off the property and deposited on the public carriageway, the consent holder will arrange for its removal as soon as is reasonably possible.
MONITORING
9. That a monitoring deposit of $220 (including GST) shall be payable to cover the reasonable costs of monitoring compliance with the above conditions in accordance with Council's schedule of charges. In the event of non-compliance being detected by monitoring or justified complaint and/or the costs of monitoring consent exceeding the deposit, the costs to Council of any additional monitoring shall be paid by the consent holder in accordance with the Council's advertised schedule of fees.
10. That all costs associated with complying with any or all conditions of this consent shall be borne by the consent holder.
wITH THE REASONS FOR THIS RECOMMENDATION BEING
1. The GENERAL condition ensures that the development proceeds in accordance with the plans and information submitted and assessed. 2. The STOCK ACCESS condition ensures that stock access does not impact on the stability of the earthworks and the establishment of grass cover.
3. The WEED MANAGEMENT condition ensures that the establishment of weeds does not compromise grass growth or accentuate the former alignment of the track. 4. The ACCIDENTAL DISCOVERY PROTOCOL condition ensures that any incident involving accidental discovery of koiwi, archaeology or artefacts is appropriately managed and communicated.
5. The CONSTRUCTION NOISE conditions ensure that the proposal complies with the New Zealand Standard for Construction Noise (NZS6803:1999). 6. The DUST AND DEBRIS condition ensures that any adverse effects resulting from the operation of the proposal do not adversely affect adjacent properties or public roads. 7. The MONITORING conditions ensure that the consent holder pays the actual and reasonable charges associated with monitoring the consent and that all conditions of consent are monitored for compliance. 8. The ADVERSE EFFECTS of this proposal are not significant, and are acceptable in the circumstances, in that: Landscape Character and Visual Amenity
· The adverse visual and landscape effects arising from the earthworks required to remove the remainder of the track will be short term and of low magnitude; · In the context of the existing environment, which includes the effects of the current formed sections of track, the proposed earthworks will facilitate a significant overall improvement in landscape character and visual amenity, particularly over time.
Erosion and Sedimentation · The methodology for the track removal work incorporates measures to ensure that erosion and sedimentation is managed; · There is no likelihood of significant erosion or sedimentation occurring and the completed ground profile is expected to remain largely intact even through heavy rain events and overland stormwater flow.
Life Supporting Capacity of Soil Resource
· The temporary loss of productive capacity while stock are prevented from grazing will result in a minimal loss of productive capacity in the context of the District’s rural land resource.
Maori Spiritual and Cultural Values
· The earthworks will reduce existing adverse effects on Maori spiritual and cultural values by removing the track, the continued existence of which is strongly opposed by Maori.
9. The proposal is consistent with the OBJECTIVES, POLICIES and OTHER PROVISIONS of the Proposed Hastings District Plan, in that: · Any adverse effects on the environment can be mitigated by appropriate conditions, and through the methodology proposed in the application; · The proposal will remediate existing adverse landscape and visual amenity effects on Te Mata Peak, the landscape qualities of which are afforded the highest level of protection under the Plan’s policy framework; · The proposal will assist in the achievement of outcomes that are more consistent with Maori cultural and spiritual values than the existing situation with the Craggy Range Track in place. Te Mata Peak is a feature of cultural significance to Ngati Kahungunu and hapu, as well as other members of the community, and its remediation is consistent with the objectives and policies of the District Plan;
10. Overall the proposal promotes sustainable management as required by Part 2 of the Resource Management Act 1991 in that:
· It will result in the removal of significant adverse effects on landscape character and amenity, and Maori cultural and spiritual values; · Any potential adverse effects of the proposed earthworks can be avoided, remedied or mitigated by conditions of consent.
ADVICE NOTES 1. To avoid doubt, except as otherwise allowed by this resource consent, all land uses must comply with all remaining standards and terms of the relevant Hastings District Plan. The proposal must also comply with the Building Act 2004, Engineering Code of Practice and Hawke’s Bay Regional Plans. All necessary consents and permits shall be obtained prior to development.
2. Under Section 125 of the Resource Management Act 1991 a resource consent will lapse if not given effect to within 5 years of the date the consent was granted, unless an extension is granted under Section 125(1A).
|
1 |
Submission #1 - Environmental Defence |
97017#0076 |
Document 2 |
Submission #2 - Warwick Marshall |
97017#0077 |
Document 2 |
|
Submission #3 - Rosemary Cunningham |
97017#0078 |
Document 2 |
|
Submission #4 - Kenneth Charles Miller |
97017#0079 |
Document 2 |
|
Submission #5 - Ngati Mihiroa |
97017#0080 |
Document 2 |
|
Submission #6 - Helen Teresa Barlow |
97017#0081 |
Document 2 |
|
Submission #7 - Stuart Colin Perry - see submission #9 |
|
Document 2 |
|
Submission #8 - Ike Wallace |
97017#0083 |
Document 2 |
|
9 |
Submission #9 - Stuart Colin Perry |
97017#0084 |
Document 2 |
Submission #10 - Robert Earnest Parsons MacDonald |
97017#0085 |
Document 2 |
|
Submission #11 - Alexandra Bartlett |
97017#0086 |
Document 2 |
|
Submission #12 - John James McKeefry |
97017#0087 |
Document 2 |
|
Submission #13 - Paddy Maloney and Anne Maloney |
97017#0088 |
Document 2 |
|
Submission #14 - Sonya Rahira Walsh and Brendon Hugh Doyle |
97017#0089 |
Document 2 |
|
Submission #15 - Christine Nepata Kidwell |
97017#0090 |
Document 2 |
|
Submission #16 - Jacqueline Elizabeth Chambers and Pounamu Tipiwai-Chambers |
97017#0091 |
Document 2 |
|
Submission #17 - Fiona Hosford |
97017#0092 |
Document 2 |
|
Submission #18 - Ngati Kahungunu Iwi |
97017#0093 |
Document 2 |
|
Submission #19 - Waimarama Maori Committee |
97017#0094 |
Document 2 |
|
Submission #20 - Margaret Adele Kahuirangi Mohi McGoverin |
97017#0095 |
Document 2 |
|
Submission #21 - Rose Mohi |
97017#0096 |
Document 2 |
|
22 |
Submission #22 - Brian (Bruno) John Chambers |
97017#0097 |
Document 2 |
Submission #23 - Christopher Malcolm Coop and Dale Coop |
97017#0098 |
Document 2 |
|
Submission #24 - Te Taiwhenua o Heretaunga Trust |
97017#0099 |
Document 2 |
|
Submission #25 - Te Mata Peak Peoples Track Society Inc |
97017#0100 |
Document 2 |
|
Submission #26 - Renata Tomoana (Waipatu Marae Committee) |
97017#0101 |
Document 2 |
|
Submission #27 - Te Mata Park Trust Board |
97017#0102 |
Document 2 |
|
Planning report |
97017#0129 |
|
|
Public Notice |
97017#0040 |
Document 3 |
|
Description of Proposal and Assessment of Environmental Effects |
97017#0035 |
Document 3 |
|
Applicant response to request for clarification |
97017#0126 |
Document 3 |